The manuscript will be reviewed by 2 (two) reviewers at least.
Editorial Board protect all the confidential materials submitted to the journal, and all communications between authors and reviewers.
Editorial Board will check plagiarism using Ithenticate. If there is a plagiarism indication, Editor can reject it.
Manuscripts will be reviewed using a double blind peer review method which is both the author and the reviewer do not know each others' identity.
A Brief Review Process:
The editor receives the manuscript from the author.
The editor evaluates all manuscripts and can reject them if they do not meet the criteria (Pre-review).
The editor send manuscript to the reviewer with the review form.
The reviewer send back the review form to Editor with necessary revision manuscript.
The Editor decision (rejected, need a major revision, needs a minor revision, or is accepted).
Confirmation to the author. If revision is required, the author(s) must revise the manuscript and submit it to the editor on agreed schedule. Returns that is longer than one month will be considered as a new submission.
Is the manuscript content according to the focus and scope of the journal?
Is the content of abstract, keywords, and/or figures or tables complete?
Does the language meet the standard of scientific language?
Is the manuscript indicated falsification, fabrication, plagiarism?
Is the research method unclear?
Title: Is the title effective, clear, concise, and informative?
Abstract: Does the abstract contain objectives, methods, important research findings, and conclusions? Does it meet the maximum 150-words limitation?
Introduction: Are the introduction arrangements written in an effective, clear and organized? Does the introduction contain a state of the art overview of previous studies/researches? Does the introduction contain clear gap analysis statements to show the new contributions and show differences from previous studies? Does the introduction contain clear and specific research objectives?
Research Methods: Is the methodology description written clearly and completely? Is the research methodology appropriate and successful to resolve research questions? Does the author need to put other materials in supporting research data?
Results and Discussion: Do the research data and discussion have a logical connection to conclusions? Are tables, figures, and schemes clear? Are additional experimental data or additional analysis needed? Is there a comparison between the results of this study with previous studies which presented in introduction?
Conclusions: Are conclusions valid based on research findings? Do they answer the research objectives? Are conclusions supported by research and analysis data? Do the sentences contain repetition? It should be noted that conclusions are different from Abstract.
References: Are the references relevant to the discussion? Are all citation sources in the text written in footnotes?
Overall comment: Is this manuscript original, shows novelty or new contributions, and has significance to develope scientific fields in the focus and scope of the journal Verbum Christi?
Do the manuscripts need to be revised (major or minor)? Is it good to publish?
Does the manuscript still contain of the ethic violate element in Publications (plagiarism, falsification, fabrication, or being reviewed in another journal)? The tolerance limit in Ithenticate is a 25% maximum of all manuscript contents in references and citations sentences.
Are there the manuscript parts that have not been corrected according to the corrections of the two reviewers?