Beralih ke bagian utama Beralih ke menu navigasi utama Beralih ke bagian footer website
Verbum Christi
Artikel
DOI: 10.51688/VC10.1.2023.art2
Telah diserahkan: 2021-01-12
Diterbitkan: 2023-04-28

Afirmasi Reformed Injili terhadap Teologi Natural

Universitas Pelita Harapan
##plugins.generic.jatsParser.article.authorBio##
×

Hendra Yohanes

Penulis telah menyelesaikan studi S1 fisika di Universitas Riau dan studi pascasarjana teologi di STT Seminari Alkitab Asia Tenggara (Malang). Sekarang ia mengajar teologi di Faculty of Liberal Arts, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

teologi natural kitab alam ciptaan Reformed Injili dampak noetik dosa

Abstrak

Apakah teologi Reformed mesti mengimplikasikan penolakan keras terhadap teologi natural? Apakah kalangan Kristen Reformed perlu sepenuhnya meremehkan atau merendahkan teologi natural? Di dalam artikel ini, penulis berargumentasi bahwa gagasan “kitab alam” akan menjadi fondasi historis-teologis untuk menghargai wahyu umum di dalam alam ciptaan dan meneguhkan teologi natural. Penulis akan meringkaskan ikhtisar sejarah dari gagasan liber naturae di dalam kekristenan dan dalam tradisi Reformed itu sendiri. Selanjutnya, penulis akan menyajikan argumentasi dari sudut pandang sebagai seorang Reformed Injili dalam menanggapi keberatan-keberatan terhadap teologi natural. Sejalan dengan teologi Reformed dan Evangelikalisme, kitab alam perlu dibaca dengan kacamata Kitab Suci, dan teologi natural juga ditegaskan sebagai sebuah langkah persiapan dalam pemberitaan injil.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

  1. Ablondi, Fred. Reading Nature’s Book: Galileo and the Birth of Modern Philosophy. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.
  2. Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics: God and Creation. Edited by John Bolt. Translated by John Vriend. Vol. 2. 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004.
  3. ———. Reformed Dogmatics: Prolegomena. Edited by John Bolt. Translated by John Vriend. Vol. 1. 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.
  4. Bird, Michael F. Romans. The Story of God Bible Commentary: The New Testament Series 6. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2016.
  5. Blowers, Paul M. Drama of the Divine Economy: Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  6. Bolt, John. “Getting the ‘two Books’ Straight: With a Little Help from Herman Bavinck and John Calvin.” Calvin Theological Journal 46, no. 2 (November 2011): 315–332.
  7. Crowther, Kathleen. “The Lutheran Book of Nature.” In The Book of Nature and Humanity in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, edited by David Hawkes and Richard G. Newhauser. Vol. 29. Arizona Studies in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2013.
  8. Fergusson, David. Creation. Guides to Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.
  9. Fesko, J. V. Reforming Apologetics: Retrieving the Classic Reformed Approach to Defending the Faith. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2019.
  10. Grabill, Stephen J. Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics. Emory University Studies in Law and Religion. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.
  11. Grudem, Wayne A. Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. Leicester; Grand Rapids: Inter-Varsity; Zondervan, 1994.
  12. Harrison, Peter. “The Metaphor ‘the Book of Nature’ and Early Modern Science.” In The Book of Nature in Early Modern and Modern History, edited by Klaas van Berkel and Arjo Vanderjagt, 1–26. Leuven: Peeters, 2006.
  13. Helm, Paul. “John Calvin, the Sensus Divinitatis, and the Noetic Effects of Sin.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (1998): 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003174629151.
  14. Heltzel, Peter G. “Interpreting the Book of Nature in the Protestant Tradition.” Journal of Faith and Science Exchange 4 (2000): 223–239. https://hdl.handle.net/2144/3983.
  15. Holder, Rodney. “Karl Barth and the Legitimacy of Natural Theology.” Themelios 26, no. 3 (2001): 22–37. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/karl-barth-and-the-legitimacy-of-natural-theology/.
  16. Jorink, Eric. Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1575-1715. Translated by Peter Mason. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.
  17. Larsen, Timothy. “Defining and Locating Evangelicalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Evangelical Theology, edited by Timothy Larsen and Daniel J. Treier, 1–14. Cambridge Companions to Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  18. Loke, Andrew Ter Ern. “Theological Critiques of Natural Theology: A Reply to Andrew Moore.” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 61, no. 2 (2019): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2019-0011.
  19. McGrath, Alister E. A Scientific Theology: Nature. Vol. 1. Edinburgh; New York: T&T Clark, 2001.
  20. ———. “Evangelical Theological Method: The State of the Art.” In Evangelical Futures: A Conversation on Theological Method, edited by John G. Stackhouse, 15–37. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2000.
  21. ———. Evangelicalism & the Future of Christianity. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 1995.
  22. ———. The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology. Malden; Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
  23. Moo, Douglas J. Romans. The NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000.
  24. Moore, Andrew. “Should Christians Do Natural Theology?” Scottish Journal of Theology 63, no. 2 (May 2010): 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930610000013.
  25. Plantinga, Alvin. Knowledge and Christian Belief. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.
  26. ———. “The Prospects for Natural Theology.” Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991): 287–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214098.
  27. ———. “The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology.” In Philosophical Knowledge, 54:49–62. Philosophy Documentation Center, 1980.
  28. ———. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  29. Rehnman, Sebastian. “A Reformed Natural Theology?” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4, no. 1 (2012): 151–175. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i1.312.
  30. Schreiner, Thomas R. Romans. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 6. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1998.
  31. Sudduth, Michael. “Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2009): 37–62. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.340.
  32. Sutanto, Nathaniel Gray. “Neo-Calvinism on General Revelation: A Dogmatic Sketch.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 20, no. 4 (2018): 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12333.
  33. Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe. “The Two Books Prior to the Scientific Revolution.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 57, no. 3 (2005): 235–248.
  34. VanDrunen, David. “‘The Kingship of Christ Is Twofold’: Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms in the Thought of Herman Bavinck.” Calvin Theological Journal 45, no. 1 (April 2010): 147–164.
  35. Xu, Ximian. “Herman Bavinck’s ‘Yes’ and Karl Barth’s ‘No’: Constructing a Dialectic-In-Organic Approach to the Theology of General Revelation.” Modern Theology 35, no. 2 (April 2019): 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12469.
  36. The Westminster Confession of Faith. Glasgow: Free Presbyterian, 1990.

Cara Mengutip

Yohanes, H. (2023). Afirmasi Reformed Injili terhadap Teologi Natural. Verbum Christi: Jurnal Teologi Reformed Injili, 10(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.51688/VC10.1.2023.art2